bobbingwide

vsgloik

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. 
The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. 
Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef but the wrod as a wlohe.
This plugin implements a version of an algorithm that will produce text similar to the above. 
Basically it changes each word by randomising the order of the letters, leaving the first and last letter of each word the same.
You implement this on your website using the [bbboing] shortcode.
The syntax is:
[bbboing 
 text=”seed|text – some text to obfuscate” 
 form=”N|Y – display form to allow changes” 
 both=”N|Y – display both original and output text”]
If you don’t specify any parameters you get a ‘bbboing’ed version of the original text.
Examples: 
 [bbboing text=”code is poetry”] may produce ‘code is peroty’ or ‘cdoe is pretoy’ 
 [bbboing text=’powered by WordPress’] may produce ‘prweoed by WrdsorPes’
It’s also feasible that the randomisation produces exactly the same output as input. 
So [bbboing text=’bobbing wide’] may produce ‘bobbing wide’
Of course, nothing happens for words with fewer than 4 letters so 
[bbboing text=’it is not a con’] WILL produce the same output as input.
You may notice that some spammers/spambots intentionally misspell words when creating comments. 
bbboing does not in anyway endorse this.
Please use bbboing for your own amusement.
Note: the bbboing plugin is dependent upon the oik plugin.

bbboing

obfuscate text but leave it readable, apparently

Scott Reilly

Obfuscate email addresses to deter email-harvesting spammers, with a focus on retaining the appearance and functionality of email hyperlinks.
“Obfuscation” simply means that techniques are employed to modify email address strings that appear on your site in such a way that bots scraping your site are unable to identify those addresses; however, at the same time those emails addresses should still look and work correctly for visitors, as much as possible.
The plugin allows for use of one or more (or all!) of three techniques for email protection that have proven themselves in the past. While techniques abound for email obfuscation, the three techniques included provide the best balance of email address protection with minimal impact on visitors. You can decide on a technique by technique basis which ones you’d like to employ as some have potential drawbacks. The plugin’s settings page allows you select which techniques to use.
Ultimately, your best bet would be to not publicly expose an email address and to offer a contact form as an alternative means of contact. Or you can just accept that email addresses will get scraped and spammed, and rely on an email service that is good at filtering out spam. But this plugin is here for you if you want to employ the most reasonable means of making email harvesting difficult for your site.
See Filters section for <code>c2c_obfuscate_email_filters</code> for complete list of filters that are processed.
Please read the Details section of this documentation to learn more about the techniques employed.
<h3>Details</h3>
The email obfuscation techniques included in this plugin were chosen for their effectiveness and general applicability with minimal impact on users. I urge you to read about an <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20180908103745/http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/07/20/ten-methods-to-obfuscate-e-mail-addresses-compared/" rel="nofollow ugc">experiment</a> performed by Silvan Mühlemann in which he protected email addresses using nine different techniques. He ensured the page containing those email addresses got indexed by Google and then waited 1.5 years. During that time he measured the amount of spam received to each of the email addresses. (Note: this experiment came out a few years after this plugin was originally created, but at this point was conducted over 10 years ago. Its conclusions may not apply as strongly today.)
Three techniques stood out as having received zero spam emails during that time. Two of those three techniques are included in this plugin. The fourth of his techniques is also included even though it did get a very small amount of spam — the technique was still very effective and more importantly does not rely on users to have CSS or JavaScript enabled.
The techniques are as follows. Two are enabled by default. Weigh the requirements against what you’re comfortable requiring of visitors in order for them to see and make use of email addresses you post on your site.
(For all the examples below, assume you have the link <code><a href="mailto:person@example.com">person@example.com</a></code> in your post.)
<h4>Using CSS display:none</h4>
<ul>
<li>
How does it work? Garbage text, wrapped in span tags, is inserted into any displayed email addresses. Using CSS, the text gets hidden so that visitors see the email addresses as intended. Email scrapers don’t typically utilize a CSS engine to help determine how text would look onscreen.
</li>
<li>
Uses CSS? Yes, which means if a visitor does not have CSS enabled, the emails will appear with extra text in them.
</li>
<li>
Uses JavasScript? No.
</li>
<li>
Can visitor copy-n-paste the link from onscreen text without needing to make modifications? Yes (unless they have CSS disabled).
</li>
<li>
Does this protect email addresses appearing in mailto: links and within HTML tag attributes? No.
</li>
<li>
How effective is this? In the aforementioned experiment, no spam emails were received when using just this technique.
</li>
<li>
Example
<pre><code><a href="mailto:person@example.com">person@nullexample.com</a>
</code></pre>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Replacing the `@` and `.` characters</h4>
<ul>
<li>
How does it work? The <code>@</code> and <code>.</code> characters are replaced with alternative strings, such as <code>AT</code> and <code>DOT</code>, respectively. The exact replacements are configurable on the plugin’s settings page. By default, if you don’t specify custom replacements, the plugin will use entity substitution (<code>@</code> becomes <code>@</code> and <code>.</code> becomes <code>.</code>).
</li>
<li>
Uses CSS? No.
</li>
<li>
Uses JavasScript? No.
</li>
<li>
Can visitor copy-n-paste the link from onscreen text without needing to make modifications? No, though it should (hopefully) be clear to the user what they need to replace.
</li>
<li>
Does this protect emails appearing in mailto: links and within HTML tag attributes? Yes, though if you specify custom replacement strings visitors clicking on a mailto link will have to modify the email address that shows up in their mail program.
</li>
<li>
How effective is this? In the aforementioned experiment, almost no spam emails were received when using just this technique. As a bonus, this technique does not require the support of any particular client-side techniques (CSS or JavaScript).
</li>
<li>
Examples
<ul>
<li>Custom AT and DOT replacements
<ul>
<li><code><a href="mailto:personATexampleDOTcom">personATexampleDOTcom</a></code></li>
<li><code><a href="mailto:person@DELETETHISexample.com">person@DELETETHISexample.com</a></code></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Everything encoded (aka hexadecimal HTML entity substitution) 
<a href="mailto:person@example.com" rel="nofollow ugc">person@example.com</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Changing text direction with CSS (not enabled by default)</h4>
<ul>
<li>
How does it work? The email addresses are sent reversed in the markup. Using CSS, the text gets reversed so that visitors see the email addresses as intended. Email scrapers don’t recognize the emails in their reversed form and don’t typically utilize a CSS engine to help determine how text would look onscreen.
</li>
<li>
Uses CSS? Yes, which means if a visitor does not have CSS enabled, the emails will appear backwards to them.
</li>
<li>
Uses JavasScript? No.
</li>
<li>
Can visitor copy-n-paste the link from onscreen text without needing to make modifications? No, text copied in such a manner will be reversed. However, a right-click -> “copy link/email address” will work properly for linked email addresses.
</li>
<li>
Does this protect emails appearing in mailto: links and within HTML tag attributes? No.
</li>
<li>
How effective is this? In the aforementioned experiment, no spam emails were received when using just this technique.
</li>
<li>
Example:
<pre><code><a href="mailto:person@example.com">moc.elpmaxe@nosrep</a>
</code></pre>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>How it looks</h4>
If all techniques are enabled at once, the resulting obfuscation of the example link above is (for the full effect, view this in the page’s source or the <a href="" rel="nofollow ugc">readme.txt</a> file directly):
<pre><code><a href="mailto:person@example.com">moc.elpmaxenull@nosrep</a>
</code></pre>
However, in your browser it would appear to you as it does prior to obfuscation, and the link for the email would still work. Theoretically, however, spammers would have a somewhat more difficult time harvesting the emails you display or link to in your posts.
NOTE: (Only when using the custom replacement feature will visitors need to modify the email address for use in their email program.)
Links: <a href="https://coffee2code.com/wp-plugins/obfuscate-email/" rel="nofollow ugc">Plugin Homepage</a> | <a href="https://wordpress.org/plugins/obfuscate-email/" rel="ugc">Plugin Directory Page</a> | <a href="https://github.com/coffee2code/obfuscate-email/" rel="nofollow ugc">GitHub</a> | <a href="https://coffee2code.com" rel="nofollow ugc">Author Homepage</a>
<h3>Template Tags</h3>
The plugin provides one optional template tag for use in your theme templates.
<h4>Functions</h4>
<ul>
<li><code>function c2c_obfuscate_email( $text, $args = array() )</code></li>
</ul>
<h4>Arguments</h4>
<ul>
<li>
<code>$text</code> 
Required argument. The text and/or HTML that contains email addresses that you want to be obfuscated.
</li>
<li>
<code>$args</code> 
Optional argument. An array of configuration options, each element of which will override the plugin’s corresponding default setting.
<ul>
<li>encode_everything (boolean) : Encode all characters in the email address using hexadecimal HTML entity substitution?</li>
<li>use_text_direction (boolean) : Utilize CSS text direction technique?</li>
<li>use_display_none (boolean) : Utilize CSS display:none technique?</li>
<li>at_replace (string) : String to use in place of <code>@</code> in email addresses (used only if encode_everything is false)</li>
<li>dot_replace (string) : String to use in place of <code>.</code> in email addresses (used only if encode_everything is false)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Examples</h4>
<ul>
<li>
Basic usage. Obfuscate email addresses in $text according to current plugin settings.
</li>
<li>
Override all plugin default settings when obfuscating email addresses in $text and just use text direction technique.
 true, ‘use_display_none’ => false, ‘encode_everything’ => false, ‘at_replace’ => ”, ‘dot_replace’ => ”) 
) ); ?>
<h3>Hooks</h3>
The plugin exposes one filter for hooking. Typically, code making use of filters should ideally be put into a mu-plugin or site-specific plugin (which is beyond the scope of this readme to explain).
</li>
</ul>
c2c_obfuscate_email_filters (filter)
The ‘c2c_obfuscate_email_filters’ filter allows you to customize what filters get processed for email obfuscation. The following filters are all filtered by default:
<ul>
<li>link_description</li>
<li>link_notes</li>
<li>bloginfo</li>
<li>nav_menu_description</li>
<li>term_description</li>
<li>the_title</li>
<li>the_content</li>
<li>get_the_excerpt</li>
<li>comment_text</li>
<li>list_cats</li>
<li>widget_text</li>
<li>the_author_email</li>
<li>get_comment_author_email</li>
</ul>
Arguments:
<ul>
<li>array $filters : the default array of filters</li>
</ul>
Example:
<pre><code>/**
 * Also obfuscate emails appearing in custom field values.
 *
 * @param array $filters Filters that get filtered to obfuscate email addresses.
 * @return array
 */
function change_c2c_obfuscate_email_filters( $filters ) {
 $filters[] = 'the_meta';
 return $filters;
}
add_filter( 'c2c_obfuscate_email_filters', 'change_c2c_obfuscate_email_filters' );
</code></pre>

Obfuscate Email

show definitely no effect, either on ajax-loaded content nor on simple wordpress pages...

no effect

Obfuscate email addresses to deter email-harvesting spammers.

bbboing vs Obfuscate Email